Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
While I do not wish in any way to question or reduce the value of Kathleen's evaluation, I wonder if it is right for us to allow CA applications to be approved in the absence of any real public discussion.
As Ben pointed out, there was opportunity for public discussion, but no one took advantage of that opportunity, presumably due to not having time.
In the complete absence of any discussion, positive or negative, does it seem right to allow CAs to go into the list by default? Should we have a quorum requirement, of some sort, requiring pasticipation by at least N members before allowing approval?
I guess we could compare this to the problem of patches sitting in the queue for lack of review and superreview. Personally I would like to see at least some additional review of CA requests, whether that be by Eddy or you or whoever. But I'm also not really happy about stretching out discussion of CA requests for multiple weeks just because no one besides Kathleen has time to look at things, especially given the backlog of requests we have.
I have more comments on this, but they're probably better made in response to other post.
Frank -- Frank Hecker hec...@mozillafoundation.org -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
