Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> This is probably a policy question, but: are we willing to accept CAs
> that use CRLs that we cannot parse?

I'd say no.

> Does this CA also implement OCSP?  Can we justify this on the grounds
> that we do implement OCSP, and that OCSP will effectively displace CRLs
> as the preferred revocation channel?

I'd say no. Use of OCSP should not be made mandantory.

Ciao, Michael.
--
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to