Kathleen, this is not a snark against you, and in fact it is intended to be a very high compliment for the quality of your work.
That said, though, I have to snark: Like, OMG! It's a Mozilla Foundation person who actually wants to maintain and deal with the policies! If you haven't read my prior thanks on this list, K, then I thank you from the bottom of my heart for helping to bring order to the chaos and quagmire that the root list has historically suffered. (Also, to the proposal: I am generally in favor of governmental CAs being included, particularly when they're designed to authenticate governmental entities to their constituencies. The design of this particular PKI appears to be better than most of the ones I've looked at before, and I do not have any issues with this inclusion.) -Kyle H On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 12:12 PM, <kathleen95...@yahoo.com> wrote: > DCSSI's root inclusion request has been in public discussion for a > week now. No issues or concerns about this request have been raised. > > According to https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:How_to_apply > "If there are no open issues or action items after the first > discussion period, and there is general agreement that you comply with > our policy requirements, then at the Foundation's discretion the > second phase of public discussion may be skipped, the request will be > immediately approved, and the request will move into the inclusion > phase..." > > If no issues or concerns are raised in the next couple of days, then I > will assume it's OK to move forward with inclusion. > > Kathleen > -- > dev-tech-crypto mailing list > dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto > -- dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
