Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
If darwin/x86 uses gas, then it's should be just a matter of setting some defines in the freebl make file and testing. (the primary thing that holds back using these assembler optimizations is differences in the assembler syntax on our various platforms).Julien R Pierre - Sun Microsystems wrote, On 2009-01-21 15:03:Even if you end up building NSS with optimizations, they use the regular multiply instructions, which performs best on AMD chips, but not as well on Intel CPUs. For Intel, one needs to use the SSE2 and above instructions set, which NSS currently doesn't do - except on one platform, Linux.Is there any reason why we can't use the same optimizations on Darwin/x86 as we use on Linux?
bob
_______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
