On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Paul Hoffman <phoff...@proper.com> wrote: >>Ian G wrote, On 2009-01-04 16:01: >>There's no mozilla.policy hierarchy. So I'm searching for ideas for a >>good hierarchy for these discussions. Here are some ideas. How about: >> >>mozilla.security.CA >>mozilla.security.UI >>mozilla.security.pki > > +1 to .CA or .PKI, -1 to .UI. There is more to the security UI than PKIX, and > there is much more to trust anchors than UI.
Paul, I believe you're correct, but I also believe that Ian was suggesting an AND, not an OR. .CA (I'd actually suggest 'trustanchors') for trust anchor inclusion/exclusion discussion. +1 under either name. .UI for user interface issues (and ho boy there are many of them). +1 to this. Interestingly, I can't really see much reason for a .pki (except possibly as an adjunct to .UI, since any changes to the PKI should only be brought about due to usability requirements, and since .pki would be more of a technical discussion of the changes that need to be made... eventually [hopefully] leading to spec documents that code can be written to adhere to). +0, but I'm willing to listen to arguments for and against. -Kyle H _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
