On 27.12.2008 13:34, Gervase Markham wrote:
sayrer wrote:
The truth is that we are basically unable to act without a lot of
collateral damage. We should keep this in mind with future security
technology. Relying on companies willing to take money for doing
absolutely nothing (not even the bare minimum they agreed to) is not a
pleasant thing to do to our users. We didn't learn this lesson with
EV--maybe next time! :)
One of the points of EV was to allow us to act against a CA without
massive collateral damage. We can remove EV status from a root without
disabling the root entirely.
Well, really?
We try to train users to check that the bar is green (on sites where it
was green before), and not use the site when it's merely blue.
Otherwise, EV is useless, as the scammer could get a, say, CertStar
cert, to fake an EV site, right? Only when people start getting
concerned and stop visiting the site when it's truning green->blue is EV
of any use.
So, that means we have the same collateral damage as now.
See thread "Just change expiry time" for an alternative reaction.
Ben
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto