Anders Rundgren wrote: > I wouldn't spend much work on <keygen> and crypto.generateCRMFRequest > because they don't match today's needs anyway.
Anders, does the word <keygen> trigger an automatic response in your news bot? ;-} Your comment is not relevant in this context. Off course the *existing* implementation of <keygen> and crypto.generateCRMFRequest should be fully *documented* as Nelson suggested. Ciao, Michael. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Ströder" <mich...@stroeder.com> > Newsgroups: mozilla.dev.tech.crypto > To: <dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org> > Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2008 13:38 > Subject: Re: Security-Critical Information (i.e. Private Key) transmittedby > Firefox to CA (i.e. > Thawte) during X.509 key/cert generation > > > Nelson B Bolyard wrote: >> I also think we need a page or two on developer.mozilla.org that fully >> documents both the <keygen> tag and the crypto.generateCRMFRequest method. > > +1 > >> The existing documentation is very incomplete. The <keygen> tag, for >> example, accepts many more arguments than are now publicly documented. > > Which arguments are that? > > Ciao, Michael. _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
