Nelson B Bolyard wrote:
> [...]
> What about that problem necessitates the use of PKCS#8?
> On what stone is it chiseled that servers must read private keys from
> PKCS#8 files every time they start up?

It makes sense to limit the number of formats used, and to say the 
private key and the cert should be together, but don't say it adds 
security then.

The only difference between an unencrypted pkcs#8 key and a pkcs#12 with 
a static password or a configuration-file password is the fact that for 
one of the two it's less obvious that the only layer of security 
protecting the private key is the security mechanisms of the OS (as well 
as restricting physical access to the computer).
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to