Frank Hecker:

For everyone else's benefit: There was some confusion between Charlie Buckley and I which has now been resolved.

Which just shows what makes the comments period so valuable or what happens when four eyes review the same thing independently ;-) At least this serves as a good example for my suggestion about rethinking parts of the current CA inclusion procedures mentioned some time ago...
From my point of view Network Solutions also satisfies Mozilla policy requirements for non-EV SSL certs, based on the current CPS and audit situation.

Indeed!

However issuance of email or code signing certs would require a new application and separate approval, since the current CPS doesn't address those types of certificates.
Fair enough, I guess.

--
Regards
Signer:         Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
Jabber:         [EMAIL PROTECTED] <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Blog:   Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>
Phone:          +1.213.341.0390


_______________________________________________
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to