Paul Hoffman: > At 2:55 PM +0200 3/26/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote: > >> - We are not seeking to cause any harm to Comodo or unilaterally remove >> the roots from NSS. However can we seek the cooperation on the issues >> which were raised and is Comodo willing to address this issues in good >> faith? >> > > Why just Comodo? They are not the only CA that has some of the > features that you seem to dislike, Eddy. >
I didn't single out Comodo,considering the fact that other CAs have just weeks ago gone through the same process. I have reviewed all other CAs and raised questions and concerns concerning them if needed. At none of the CAs I've encountered the things Comodo does and it's my duty to speak up on this matter! > At the very minimum, changing the subject line of the thread would > make it clear that the discussion is about a consideration of > changing the rules for everyone, not just Comodo. > I have already mentioned that an eventual change in the Mozilla CA policy will have to be effective on all CAs. But I'd be really interested to know which other CA does issue *DOMAIN* *VALIDATED* certificate for a life-time of *TEN* years and also issues *DOMAIN* *VALIDATED* *WILD* *CARD* certificates without any additional verifications - and also these for a life-time of *TEN* years? Robin from Comodo claims to know such CAs, maybe you know some too? In that case I request kindly to back it up and point us to the relevant CPS of the affected CAs. As of now this is an issue which concerns Comodo and its evaluation here. -- Regards Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org> Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Blog: Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org> Phone: +1.213.341.0390 _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
