Frank Hecker: > Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote: > >> 3.) Here a few questions in relation to the LiteSSL CPS: >> > > In reference to this, it's not clear to me whether Comodo still issues > LiteSSL certificates or not. Note that the LiteSSL CPS Addendum is an > addendum to version 2.4 of the Comodo CPS. However the current CPS > version is 3.0, and that version does not mention LiteSSL except in > passing. Since www.litessl.com now redirects to www.positivessl.com, I > suspect that LiteSSL as a Comodo brand is defunct and was replaced by > PositiveSSL. > Well, you must know that, since you put this information at the "Pending" page in first place, I just followed the links there. We shouldn't assume anything when evaluating CAs either. But in any case this CPS is still very much relevant EVEN if Comodo doesn't actively issue certificates according to this CPS anymore, because the intermediate CA certificate seems to be still valid and seems to be mentioned in the version 3 CPS and their certificates carry a lifetime of up to ten years and beyond.
Nevertheless the questions I asked are still valid since their version 3 CPS has the same content. I can find the relevant sections later on, the only thing which differs as I can see is the section concerning relying parties. I haven't gone through the other CPS yet, but I guess this is a good opportunity doing so. -- Regards Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org> Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Blog: Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org> Phone: +1.213.341.0390 _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
