Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote: > Robert Relyea wrote: > >> I'm currently running my Firefox and TB against the sqlite3 database. >> The main impediment to general deployment is Bug 391296. >> >> New NSS applications would not have to worry about the issues in Bug >> 391296. >> > > I really think than simply supporting mode 2 (see > http://wiki.mozilla.org/NSS_Shared_DB#Database_Upgrade) and not solving > bug 391296 is sufficient for Firefox. > > Before the support for shared databases, people who had multiple > application using non-shared db and a need to share certificates between > them had to export them in pkcs#12 and reimport, and do it again each > time they got a new certificate. > > With mode 2, those people have to do it again but only once at the time > they do the merging between the db of two application, and never again > after that. This is already a big improvement. > > I do not see the fact it could be done even better if bug 391296 were > implemented, not requiring that manual step for the first merge, as a > good reason to block that improvement. Shared DB would be one of the greatest things! So I'm not able to judge if and when it can be done, but looking very much forward to it.
Bob, how can I enable this for FF and TB to share the same DB? -- Regards Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org> Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Blog: Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org> Phone: +1.213.341.0390 _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
