Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote: > Robert Relyea wrote: >> I would be OK with accepting validations started before June 12, 2007 >> based on Draft 11. Webtrust's chart indicates that their validations >> switched to 1.0 immediately on it's approval by the CAB (including >> mid-evaluation for those that weren't completed before June 12, 2007). >> This is pretty much true of all early EV issuers, and should clear >> itself out once the revaluations are completed. > Do you mean before or after? If before, how much before that date?
As I wrote previously, I don't want to parse this too closely, but I think the situation may be as follows: * WebTrust EV audits completed by June 12, 2007 would have used the draft 11 guidelines. * WebTrust EV audits started before June 12, 2007 but completed after that date would have used the draft 11 guidelines and then switched to the 1.0 guidelines after their adoption. * WebTrust EV audits started after June 12, 2007 would have used the 1.0 guidelines. In terms of revising our policy I don't think it really matters. We'd just consider the draft 11 and 1.0 guidelines to both be acceptable (at least until some future date), and we wouldn't need to determine exactly which version of the guidelines was used when. To make this more concrete, I'll file a bug with a proposed policy change to reflect this line of thinking. Frank -- Frank Hecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
