C.J. Adams-Collier wrote:
> I don't feel comfortable with the approval of inclusion based on an
> obsoleted document, though.  If the applicant could be requested to publish
> the most recent daft as HTML, PDF or plain text, the public would be able to
> review the document, and I would feel more comfortable.

See my previous message; the English version of the current CPS is at

http://www.turktrust.com.tr/pdf/cps_third.pdf

Frank

-- 
Frank Hecker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to