C.J. Adams-Collier wrote: > I don't feel comfortable with the approval of inclusion based on an > obsoleted document, though. If the applicant could be requested to publish > the most recent daft as HTML, PDF or plain text, the public would be able to > review the document, and I would feel more comfortable.
See my previous message; the English version of the current CPS is at http://www.turktrust.com.tr/pdf/cps_third.pdf Frank -- Frank Hecker [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto