Mike Helm wrote:
> I will try that, but I predict it will fail if they use the same format.
>
> One of my colleagues has found a recent bug in bugzilla on this
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=399188 
> and  it appears that firefox is ignoring the mime type and
> looking at the .spc extension, and then dropping into
> Windows file management.  This is not what it does on, say, XP,
> where the same transaction works fine.  I have not instrumented
> XP to see if the same pkcs#7 package & mime type header get sent
> by Thawte to this client (seems like a reasonable assumption, tho).
>
> My colleague was able to create a web page that would trick
> the firefox browser on Vista into downloading & installing
> the cert: he took the cert out, renamed the extension to some
> junk, and then had the page send the proper pkcs7 headers down
> along with the cert.  Then firefox-on-vista loaded the cert
> properly.
If this is really the case on Vista than I rather suspect that the OS 
intercepts the file based on the extension...can this be? I'm not a 
Windows expert, much less Vista. So I expected the mime type to be 
application/x-x509-user-cert and that FF doesn't bother at all about the 
file extension. As a matter of fact the web page serving the 
certificate, can be called really anything....except maybe on Vista?

-- 
Regards 
 
Signer:         Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org>
Jabber:         [EMAIL PROTECTED] <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Blog:   Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org>
Phone:          +1.213.341.0390
 

_______________________________________________
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to