Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote:
> Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
>> Any CA that accepts to deliver code signing certificate to individuals 
>> and not companies will have an extremly hard time doing a high quality 
>> identity verification.
>>   
> Really? Why is that? Personally I tend to trust individuals more then 
> "companies" which can come and go within a matter of days!

If you can do a face to face meeting with a person, if you can confirm 
what his job is, where his home is, if you grasp elements about him that 
  he is very unlikely to just walk away from, yes, you can trust him 
more that a company whose stability you did not check.

But if you can not do a face to face meeting, they are usually very few 
publicly available registries where an individual must be registered and 
that you can use to check the validity of his info. Whereas they are 
several for companies. And they usually also allow to check how long the 
company has been in existence, as well as other points that help you 
minimize the risk the company will be gone in a few days.

>> Next page ask me to enter a Surname/First Name/Phone number for 
>> Technical Contact, and an Admin Contact Person with email, Street & 
>> number, and Phone number in addition to the Payment Method info.
>> So the question is will they properly identify and reject a non 
>> responding number or a cell phone number ?
> And if the phone number is a public phone around the corner? Or a 
> cell-phone for rent? Is this verified by a third party that the number 
> belongs to the person/company in question?

Public phone already are a bit painful, you will need to have someone 
constantly by the phone to answer it for a period that may last several 
days, unless it's highly predictable when the CA will call back. But of 
course if cell-phone for rent, or prepaid phone are accepted, it becomes 
extremely easy.

So a good policy must do that sort of checks, and you'll find them 
inside the EV certificate procedure :
&14/b/1
"All items listed in subsection (a)(1) above MUST
be verified directly [...] or [...] using an address or phone number 
obtained from a Qualified Independent Information Source."

Note that the logic is reversed. You don't check the phone provided 
belongs to the company, but you check that you can use the phone number 
given by an authoritative source to contact the person who requested the 
certificate.

The trouble is that you can not really do the same for an individual. 
Just a little later in the doc, the EV procedure describes how to 
authentify an individual, and it starts with "face to face meeting".
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to