Dave Townsend wrote: > It doesn't cover those that won't pay for the SSL and don't want to host > on AMO. Yes there are people saying they are in that situation. Numbers > are difficult to guess at though.
I'm sure there are people saying they are in that situation; there are people who want something for nothing everywhere you look :-) > At this stage there's been no decision on which way to go. I'm hoping to > draw this discussion to a close in the next day or so and then post some > kind of conclusion and then the decision can be made. In order to do > that I was really hoping this thread to come out with some suggestions > on my initial proposal. So far I've only seen one post which suggests > that it can work. Given that I need to look at just how much work it > would be to implement before we can decide if it is worth implementing > it in order to continue to support those who need it. OK. Well, you know what I think, so I'll leave you to cogitate :-) Gerv _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
