Hi David,

David E. Ross wrote:
> Not only should Mozilla not accept classified audits.  We should also
> put that into the formal policy.  
I think this is already covered by the Mozilla CA policy under section 6:

/provide attestation of their conformance to the stated verification 
requirements and other operational criteria by a competent independent 
party or parties with access to details of the CA's internal operations./

If the attestation and/or relevant criteria is secret/classified, then 
the CA can't comply to the Mozilla CA policy.
> Where classifying an audit makes sense
> (e.g., for a military CA)
>   
Also this is covered in some form I guess, because section 6 also states:

/provide some service _relevant to typical users_ of our software products/

...which in your example above hardly can be the case... ;-)

-- 
Regards
 
Signer:      Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd.
Jabber:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone:       +1.213.341.0390
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to