At 4:30 PM +0100 4/12/07, Gervase Markham wrote:
>Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>  At 10:00 AM +0000 3/14/07, Gervase Markham wrote:
>>>  Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>>>  A related question that I was intending to do some research on: if a
>>>>  trust anchor ("trusted root" in this thread) has an expiration date
>>>>  in the past, doe NSS still treat it as a trust anchor, or does it
>>>>  ignore it?
>>>
>>>  I can't say for certain because I haven't seen the code, but I would
>>>  certainly hope it ignores it!
>>
>>  I would hope that NSS *would* use this information because it is what
>>  the CA has asserted about itself. RFC 3280 does not require that the
>>  processor use this information.
>
>I may have been unclear here. By "ignores it", I meant "ignore the
>cert", not "ignore the expiration date". I believe that's the original
>sense in which you used it, but I could be misreading you.

Ah! We are in agreement. If a cert says "I expire on this date in the 
past", we both would prefer that NSS would use the information and 
not use it as a trust anchor.

I still cannot find the code that would or would not implement this, however.
_______________________________________________
dev-tech-crypto mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto

Reply via email to