[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Wan-Teh Chang wrote:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Wan-Teh Chang wrote:Why would you like to use the CFB mode?Because that's what the current (non-NSS) code does. I'd rather just port, not change, the code.Is the CFB mode used in your implementation of some standard? Just curious.No, it is not a standard.But it is used by SNMP http://www.rfc-archive.org/getrfc.php?rfc=3826
The only hard issue I see is getting a PKCS #11 mechanism for CFB mode.Once that exists it should be realitively easy to add such a mechanism. The primary changes would be in softoken, pk11wrap, and possibly adding an OID in util/secoid.[ch].
I would be willing to review a patch for the NSS trunk (NSS 3.12). If one was submitted.
bob
_______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
