Bob Lord wrote: > Heikki Toivonen wrote: > Which ones have you run across? We should probably collect all the > relevant URLs.
This Google query: (site:mozilla.org OR site:mozilla.com) Libya gives 78 pages. Some of those are just cvs versions of the same file, some bogus hits, some wiki change and RSS feeds etc. I think this is the list of the actual pages: http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Download_Mozilla_Source_Code http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/src/download.html http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/security/nss/releases/export-notice http://www.mozilla.org/mirroring.html http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/releases/ http://www.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla1.0.html http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/releases/1.0a.html http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/releases/1.0b.html http://www.mozilla.org/releases/old-releases.html http://www.mozilla.org/releases/old-releases-0.9.2-1.0rc3.html http://www.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla1.0.1.html http://www.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla1.0.2.html http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/faq.html http://developer.mozilla.org/cn/docs/%E4%B8%8B%E8%BD%BDMozilla%E6%BA%90%E4%BB%A3%E7%A0%81 http://www.mozilla.org/releases/ https://www.mozilla.org/releases/ >> Also I wonder: is it ok for these notices to be somewhat hidden, in the >> sense that most people will never see them when they go download NSS or >> Mozilla because the notices are either on some developer page or a file >> in ftp root directory or something? > > This is obviously a question for a lawyer, but my guess is that it would > not be an effective notice if it was hidden. My question was not clear, but Nelson got what I meant to say: they are effectively hidden now. Is that ok or do we need to make them more prominent? -- Heikki Toivonen _______________________________________________ dev-tech-crypto mailing list dev-tech-crypto@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-tech-crypto
