Hi Josh,

Thanks for the clarification. It’s clear now. 

Thanks.

> On Mar 25, 2019, at 1:28 AM, Josh Bowman-Matthews <j...@joshmatthews.net> 
> wrote:
> 
> Automation like RampToValueAtTime and SetValueCurveAtTime does not make sense 
> independent of a node. The advantage of using a node like ConstantSourceNode 
> is that the output of the node is constant, so it's easier to evaluate the 
> effects of automation on the node's output. Does that make sense?
> 
> Cheers,
> Josh
> 
> On 3/24/19 8:58 PM, Akhilesh Venkatasubramanian wrote:
>> Hi Josh,
>> Examples seem to be for testing the nodes, not separate functions like
>> RampToValueAtTime or SetValueCurveAtTime from my understanding. So is there
>> a different type of example that we have to write in order to test our
>> implementation of SetValueCurveAtTime? The constant_source example just
>> calls RampToValueAtTime. Can you point us towards some example to the same
>> that we can make use of? (Which might help us write the example to test
>> SetValueCurveAtTime specifically).
>> Maybe if there is an example to test RampToValueAtTime alone?
>> Thanks,
>> Akhilesh
> _______________________________________________
> dev-servo mailing list
> dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo

_______________________________________________
dev-servo mailing list
dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo

Reply via email to