Hi Josh, Thanks for the clarification. It’s clear now.
Thanks. > On Mar 25, 2019, at 1:28 AM, Josh Bowman-Matthews <j...@joshmatthews.net> > wrote: > > Automation like RampToValueAtTime and SetValueCurveAtTime does not make sense > independent of a node. The advantage of using a node like ConstantSourceNode > is that the output of the node is constant, so it's easier to evaluate the > effects of automation on the node's output. Does that make sense? > > Cheers, > Josh > > On 3/24/19 8:58 PM, Akhilesh Venkatasubramanian wrote: >> Hi Josh, >> Examples seem to be for testing the nodes, not separate functions like >> RampToValueAtTime or SetValueCurveAtTime from my understanding. So is there >> a different type of example that we have to write in order to test our >> implementation of SetValueCurveAtTime? The constant_source example just >> calls RampToValueAtTime. Can you point us towards some example to the same >> that we can make use of? (Which might help us write the example to test >> SetValueCurveAtTime specifically). >> Maybe if there is an example to test RampToValueAtTime alone? >> Thanks, >> Akhilesh > _______________________________________________ > dev-servo mailing list > dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo _______________________________________________ dev-servo mailing list dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo