A macro_rules macro wouldn't serve here? On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Bobby Holley <bobbyhol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 2:24 AM, Anthony Ramine <n.ox...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Le 14 juil. 2017 à 02:13, Bobby Holley <bobbyhol...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > > > > > > There's a lot of boilerplate involved just to make a newtype [1]. Is > this > > > something we could add a custom derive for? > > > > We don't use that many newtypes to justify writing a custom derive for > > that IMO. Often we don't even bother and just do wrapper.0. > > > > Well, we all do that because writing 10 lines of boilerplate is usually > worse than scattering some .0s around. If there were a 1-line derive we > might use it more. > > > > Remove all the unneeded where clauses for E on the type definition, and > on > > the Deref* impls and you have only ~10 lines of boilerplate. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dev-servo mailing list > > dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-servo mailing list > dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo > _______________________________________________ dev-servo mailing list dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo
