Oh, I see what did you mean. ElementData and AtomicRefCell would be a problem. I don't see anything else, though.
- Xidorn On Thu, Dec 15, 2016, at 05:29 PM, Manish Goregaokar wrote: > The sugar stuff is just helpers. The crossover happens in the bindings > file > itself, where &ServoOpaqueType gets replaced with &RealType, etc. > > On Dec 14, 2016 5:13 PM, "Xidorn Quan" <m...@upsuper.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016, at 12:01 PM, Manish Goregaokar wrote: > > > They used to be a different crate. I merged them so that we can do > > > replacements with safer wrappers and have fewer coherence issues. > > > > It doesn't seem to me the safer wrappers (I suppose the ones in > > gecko_bindings/sugar?) needs the bindings to stay in the style > > component. We can still leave gecko mod in style component, and just > > split out the bindings mods. That shouldn't cause much trouble I > > suppose. > > > > > Perhaps we can make triggering local build time bindgen regen more > > > explicit? > > > > You mean, probably not listing that many files in > > cargo:rerun-if-changed? That probably works I guess. > > > > - Xidorn > > _______________________________________________ > > dev-servo mailing list > > dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-servo mailing list > dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo _______________________________________________ dev-servo mailing list dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo
