> We can probably find a way to support (while not requiring) manipulation of arbitrary CSS properties off the main thread.
Excellent! Then the issue comes down to how to get jQuery using UIWorker :) Patrick On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:21 PM, Robert O'Callahan <rob...@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Patrick Walton <pwal...@mozilla.com> > wrote: > >> A hypothetical requestAsyncAnimationFrame() API whose callback had no >> general access to the DOM and window object (though you could, for >> example, >> pass specific DOM objects in to mutate their styles) would solve this >> issue. Google's old AnimationProxy proposal was similar, but the >> properties >> it exposed were limited to those that Blink could animate in the >> compositor, while Servo has no such limitation. >> > > It seems very likely that something like AnimationProxy (currently called > UIWorker) will happen: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-houdini/2015Mar/0020.html > I think the issues raised in that email pertain to Servo as well as other > engines. > > We can probably find a way to support (while not requiring) manipulation > of arbitrary CSS properties off the main thread. > > Rob > -- > oIo otoeololo oyooouo otohoaoto oaonoyooonoeo owohooo oioso oaonogoroyo > owoiotoho oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro owoiololo oboeo > osouobojoeocoto otooo ojouodogomoeonoto.o oAogoaoiono,o oaonoyooonoeo > owohooo > osoaoyoso otooo oao oboroootohoeoro oooro osoiosotoeoro,o o‘oRoaocoao,o’o > oioso > oaonosowoeoroaoboloeo otooo otohoeo ocooouoroto.o oAonodo oaonoyooonoeo > owohooo > osoaoyoso,o o‘oYooouo ofooooolo!o’o owoiololo oboeo oiono odoaonogoeoro > ooofo > otohoeo ofoioroeo ooofo ohoeololo. > _______________________________________________ dev-servo mailing list dev-servo@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-servo
