Hello, this commentary it's quite obvious and probably unnecessary, but I would just say that the controversy that section 4 of the survey is raising is simply because many of us have the feeling that this change of certificate lifespan should have come by means of a ballot and a new version of the BR, and not in the way it's happening, with imposed deadlines. Best, Pedro
El jueves, 30 de abril de 2020, 0:48:08 (UTC+2), Kathleen Wilson escribió: > All, > > I have drafted a potential CA Communication and survey, and will greatly > appreciate your input on it. > > https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Communications#May_2020_CA_Communication > > Direct link to read-only copy of the draft survey: > https://ccadb-public.secure.force.com/mozillacommunications/CACommunicationSurveySample?CACommunicationId=a051J000042AUSv > > Purpose: > - Communicate Mozilla's expectations about what CAs should do when > audits, revocations, or other requirements are impacted by COVID-19 > restrictions. > - Remind CAs about deadlines in version 2.7 of Mozilla’s Root Store Policy. > - Collect CA input on limiting TLS cert lifetimes. > - Collect CA input on the draft CA/Browser Forum Browser Alignment Ballot. > > Thanks, > Kathleen _______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
