> But does EN 319 401, as it existed in 2016/2017 incorporate a clause to 
> apply all "future" updates to the CAB/F regulations or otherwise cover 
> all BRs applicable to the 2016/2017 timespan?

Interesting question. Would it have to explicitly claim to incorporate any 
future updates? Or would it have to explicitly *deny* to be applied to future 
updates? My personal interpretation would be to assume compliance at PIT and 
including potential future amendments, unless explicitly stated otherwise.
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
  • Certinomis Issues Wayne Thayer via dev-security-policy
    • Re: Certinomis Issues Wayne Thayer via dev-security-policy
      • Re: Certinomis Is... Ryan Sleevi via dev-security-policy
        • Re: Certinomi... Wayne Thayer via dev-security-policy
          • Re: Certi... philbouchet35--- via dev-security-policy
            • Re: ... mono.riot--- via dev-security-policy
              • ... Jakob Bohm via dev-security-policy
                • ... Wayne Thayer via dev-security-policy
                • ... mono.riot--- via dev-security-policy
                • ... mono.riot--- via dev-security-policy
                • ... Wayne Thayer via dev-security-policy
                • ... Jonathan Rudenberg via dev-security-policy
                • ... Ryan Sleevi via dev-security-policy
                • ... Wayne Thayer via dev-security-policy
                • ... Matt Palmer via dev-security-policy
                • ... okaphone.elektronika--- via dev-security-policy
                • ... fchassery--- via dev-security-policy
                • ... Matt Palmer via dev-security-policy
                • ... Andrew Ayer via dev-security-policy
                • ... Wayne Thayer via dev-security-policy

Reply via email to