On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 5:53:45 PM UTC-7, Corey Bonnell wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 7:41:33 PM UTC-4, Nick Lamb wrote:
> > (Resending after I typo'd the ML address)
> > 
> > At the risk of further embarrassing myself in the same week, while
> > working further on mimicking Firefox trust decisions I found this
> > pre-certificate for Arabtec Holding PJSC:
> > 
> > https://crt.sh/?id=926433948
> > 
> > Now there's nothing especially strange about this certificate, except
> > that its RSA public key is shared with several other certificates
> > 
> > https://crt.sh/?spkisha256=8bb593a93be1d0e8a822bb887c547890c3e706aad2dab76254f97fb36b82fc26
> > 
> > ... such as the DigiCert Global Root G2:
> > 
> > https://crt.sh/?caid=5885
> > 
> > 
> > I would like to understand what happened here. Maybe I have once again
> > made a terrible mistake, but if not surely this means either that the
> > Issuing authority was fooled into issuing for a key the subscriber
> > doesn't actually have or worse, this Arabtec Holding outfit has the
> > private keys for DigiCert's Global Root G2
> > 
> > Nick.
> 
> AFAIK there's no requirement in the BRs or Mozilla Root Policy for CAs to 
> actually verify that the Applicant actually is in possession of the 
> corresponding private key for public keys included in CSRs (i.e., check the 
> signature on the CSR), so the most likely explanation is that the CA in 
> question did not check the signature on the Applicant-submitted CSR and 
> summarily embedded the supplied public key in the certificate (assuming 
> Digicert's CA infrastructure wasn't compromised, but I think that's highly 
> unlikely).
> 
> A very similar situation was brought up on the list before, but with WoSign 
> as the issuing CA: 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/zECd9J3KBW8/OlK44lmGCAAJ
> 
> Thanks,
> Corey

While not a BR requirement, the CA's CPS does stipulate validating possession 
of private key in section 3.2.1 (looking at the change history, it appears this 
stipulation existed during the cert issuance). So something else must have 
happened here.

Except for the Arabtec cert, the other certs looks like cross-sign for the 
Digicert root. 

Thanks,
Santhan
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy

Reply via email to