On 10/18/18 2:03 PM, Joanna Fox wrote:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA/Required_or_Recommended_Practices#CP.2FCPS_Structured_According_to_RFC_3647
For clarification on this statement, "Any CPS that falls within the scope of
Mozilla’s program must not use the words “No stipulation” unless the corresponding
section in the CA/Browser Forum Baseline Requirements state “No stipulation”, “Not
applicable”, or is blank."
Is the intent to use No stipulation”, “Not applicable”, or blank
interchangeably?
No. The intent of that statement was to limit the sections for which the
CA's CP/CPS may use the words "No stipulation".
Do you have a suggestion about how to make this more clear?
Note that just before that sentence is:
"The words "No Stipulation" mean that the particular document imposes no
requirements related to that section."
And the following sentence says:
"The words “Not applicable” are acceptable to indicate that the CA’s
policies forbid the practice that is the title of the section."
To me, those mean very different things.
We did not define what a blank section means...
I think that a blank section means the same thing as "No stipulation".
Should we require that sections not be left blank?
Thanks,
Kathleen
_______________________________________________
dev-security-policy mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
