On 05/31/2018 11:54 PM, Matthew Hardeman via dev-security-policy wrote: > I wonder if you've ever annoyed a taxing authority? They have far less > humor than one might imagine. > > Just because you've formed a legal entity with such a name does not mean > that others will regard it with legitimacy. They certainly might not in > terms of engaging in actual commerce. Perhaps with respect to > certificate's organization names it should be in the certificate as it is > in life. No one would choose to use that name in an actual business that > intends to be paid. Perhaps no certificate should feature that name either. > > But why not name it "Attention '; DELETE FROM users; DELETE FROM user; > DELETE FROM customers; DELETE FROM customer; DELETE FROM client; DELETE > FROM clients; COMMIT; Injection, The Sequel, LLP"?
I'm sorry if this is considered off-topic, but as a point of trivia, related to tax authority and business name discussion has a practical example from the Norwegian business entity names in 2009; https://w2.brreg.no/kunngjoring/hent_en.jsp?kid=20090000106309&sokeverdi=979829299&spraak=en New business enterprise name: ';UPDATE TAXRATE SET RATE = 0 WHERE NAME = 'EDVIN SYSE' they have a write-up on it on https://blogg.syse.no/syse-data-og-bronnoysundregistrene/ in Norwegian, although you'll find discussions about it if doing a: https://www.google.no/search?q=edvin+taxrate Apparently it generated so much traffic to the business registry that they were requested to change the name... -- Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-security-policy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-security-policy
