On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 8:36 AM David Teller <dtel...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> For what it's worth, when I last tried, I couldn't even `moz-phab > submit` a self-reviewed patch. I had to arbitrarily pick another > reviewer for a patch that was not meant for landing (it was a > demonstration of a reproducible bug in phabricator, but that's another > story). > Yes, moz-phab used to require a reviewer, but that was changed a year ago. See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1482216 Jan On 03/11/2019 11:14, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: > > On 11/2/19 12:53 PM, Andreas Tolfsen wrote: > >> Documentation changes have historically been well served by a “wiki > >> editing”/micro adjustments approach. I wonder if there is anything > >> we can do with Phabricator to ease review requirements for documentation > >> changes from peers? > > > > I think you can land patches without review even with Lando. I > > personally think that's acceptable for typo fixes / documentation > > updates / etc. > > > > It's certainly a few more clicks than `git push` / `hg push` though. > > > > -- Emilio > > > > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dev-platform mailing list > >> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > dev-platform mailing list > > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
