The W3C is proposing a new charter for:

  Decentralized Identifier (DID) Working Group
  https://www.w3.org/2019/08/did-wg-charter.html
  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Aug/0000.html

Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through
this Saturday, August 31.

Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should
say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should
support or oppose it.


I'm pretty concerned that this group isn't a good use of W3C's
resources, and that the promoters of this work and related areas of
work have convinced various parties (e.g., government agencies like
[1]) that this work is valuable, partly through the use of the W3C's
reputation to promote this work.

(I also feel like, while it's called decentralized, in practice it
seems to require more centralization than the Web, which allows
anyone to register a domain and then mint URLs.  I'm also skeptical
of the privacy claims made in the groups charter.)

That said, I think it's probably going to happen anyway no matter
what we say, so I'm not sure what, if anything, to say in the
review.  I'd probably be inclined to explicitly abstain from the
review and add brief comments to that abstention.

-David

[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2019Aug/0013.html

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                          https://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
             Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
             What I was walling in or walling out,
             And to whom I was like to give offense.
               - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to