On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 3:21 AM Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote:> > On 7/22/19 6:22 AM, Tom Schuster wrote: > > This was also discussed at https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/3255. > > It seems like Chrome does NOT plan on shipping this at the moment. > > Does "at the moment" mean they are open to shipping it in the future if > we ship it and don't run into web compat issues, or that they are not > planning to ship at all? What are Safari's plans here? What is the > proposed path to interop? >
After asking the Chrome team for clarification (https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/3255), they are interested in shipping this, but need more time and information. So I propose restricting this change to Beta/Nightly and to wait for them or until we see too much fallout. > > We didn't dig too deeply into this data, but one idea was > > that a lot of worker scripts are actually 404 text/html error pages. > > This is something telemetry could easily measure, yes? Only record > worker script types for responses that would actually get processed > (i.e. not HTTP 4xx responses). Is there a reason not to do that before > shipping this change? > Yes that would be possible. Till now my reasoning was that blocking importScripts was successful, even though it had higher usage. If we are going to delay shipping this, we might as well look into adding those counters. Tom _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
