On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:53 AM Frederik Braun <fbr...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> Having read the proposal, I think it's a good mechanism for us to know > about websites that want third-party cookies and it seems less costly to > deploy for websites than Storage Access API. > > However, it seems this is Google's counter to Apple's Storage Access > API, which we have also implemented in > <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1469714>. > IMO, these are not at all mutually exclusive. Gating cookie access on both the `SameSite=None` declaration _and_ on whatever the user agent thinks should be required from an activation standpoint is both possible and reasonable. -mike _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
