On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 12:40 AM Randell Jesup <rjesup.n...@jesup.org> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 11:40 PM Chris Peterson <cpeter...@mozilla.com> 
> >wrote:
> >> I propose that Win64 and WOW64 use the unadorned Windows UA already used
> >> by Firefox on x86 and AArch64 Windows:
> >>
> >> < "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:66.0) Gecko/20100101
> >> Firefox/66.0"
> >> > "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:66.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/66.0"
> >
> >Would there be significant downsides to hard-coding the Windows
> >version to "10.0" in order to put Windows 7 and 8.x users in the same
> >anonymity set with Windows 10 users?
> >
> >(We could still publish statistics of Windows version adoption at
> >https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/hardware )
>
> I wonder if any sites distributing windows executables might key off the
> OS version to default to the correct exe for your version of windows?

Are there known examples of apps like that? AFAICT, even Skype.com
provides the Windows 7 -compatible .exe as the download even with a
Windows 10 UA string, and you need to know to go to the Store if you
want the Windows 10-only version.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivo...@mozilla.com
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to