On 9/20/18 5:59 PM, Andrew McCreight wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:44 PM Kris Maglione <kmagli...@mozilla.com> wrote:

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 05:37:46PM -0700, Bobby Holley wrote:
So, I don't think we need to do anything fancy with forking - we'd just
need to capture stacks and send them via telemetry rather than as a crash
report. This was the idea behind bug 1209131, which got pretty far along
but never made it to the finish line.

This would actually potentially even give us better information
than fork-and-crash, since we should be able to include JS
stacks in that setup too. We've never been able to do that in
ordinary crash reports, since breakpad doesn't know how to
unwind JS stacks, and we can't safely ask the JS runtime to do
it while we're crashing.


Though keep in mind that any stack that includes content JS is going to
likely count as PII, so it would have to be hidden by default on Soccorro.


Please note that it would be illegal to collect such data
without asking for explicit user consent first.
The GDPR requires a "positive opt-in" mechanism:
https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/guide-to-the-general-data-protection-regulation-gdpr/lawful-basis-for-processing/consent/
Our current Telemetry permission is an opt-out mechanism.


/Mats
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to