> On 7 Aug 2018, at 5:24 pm, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote: > > OK. Do you have any signals at all from Safari and Edge? Even just knowing > "not opposed in current form but no concrete plans to implement" would be > useful, compared to them suddenly coming back with requests for changes in > the spec.
I’ll enquire on that… https://wpt.fyi/results/media-source/mediasource-changetype-play.html <https://wpt.fyi/results/media-source/mediasource-changetype-play.html> https://wpt.fyi/results/media-source/mediasource-changetype.html <https://wpt.fyi/results/media-source/mediasource-changetype.html> > >> Google’s main interest for this is for ad insertions unfortunately, a bit >> sad when there’s so much potential. > > Does this make the ad insertion case better for our users in some way, at > least? It makes it easier for the site. They typically gets ads from ad suppliers with h264/aac content ; for YouTube that allows to easily insert them in their vp9/opus content without having to convert them… So previously, you would have to either pause the current video element, create a new one, and set it as overlay, and once done tear everything done. Now, everything can be done inline, much smoother transitions
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
