I don't have an opinion on the style change itself, but I'm a very strong
+1 on just picking one and making sure clang-format enforces it.

Alex

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 9:37 AM, Emilio Cobos Álvarez <emi...@crisal.io>
wrote:

> Sorry, I know, coding style thread... But it's Friday and this is somewhat
> related to the previous thread.
>
> Bug 525063 added a lot of lines like:
>
>     explicit TTextAttr(bool aGetRootValue)
>       : mGetRootValue(aGetRootValue)
>       , mIsDefined{ false }
>       , mIsRootDefined{ false }
>     {
>     }
>
> I think I find them hard to read and ugly.
>
> Those changes I assume were generated with clang-format /
> clang-format-diff using the "Mozilla" coding style, so I'd rather ask
> people to agree in whether we prefer that style or other in order to change
> that if needed.
>
> Would people agree to use:
>
>  , mIsRootDefined { false }
>
> Instead of:
>
>  , mIsRootDefined{ false }
>
> And:
>
>  , mFoo { }
>
> Instead of:
>
>  , mFoo{}
>
> ?
>
> I assume the same would be for variables, I find:
>
>   AutoRestore<bool> restore { mFoo };
>
> easier to read than:
>
>   AutoRestore<bool> restore{ mFoo };
>
> What's people's opinion on that? Would people be fine with a more general
> "spaces around braces" rule? I can't think of a case right now where I
> personally wouldn't prefer it.
>
> Also, we should probably state that consistency is preferred (I assume we
> generally agree on that), so in this case braces probably weren't even
> needed, or everything should've switched to them.
>
> Finally, while I'm here, regarding default member initialization, what's
> preferred?
>
>   uint32_t* mFoo = nullptr;
>
> Or:
>
>   uint32_t* mFoo { nullptr };
>
> I'm ambivalent, but brace syntax should cover more cases IIUC (that is,
> there are things that you can write with braces that you couldn't with
> equals I _think_).
>
> Should we state a preference? Or just say that both are allowed but
> consistency is better?
>
>  -- Emilio
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to