I’ve forwarded this conversation thread to our UX researcher and designer, Francis and Jacqueline. If we’ve run any studies, they’d be able to link us to a report.
On 12 February 2018 at 11:58, Karl Dubost <kdub...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Johann, > > Le 10 févr. 2018 à 00:51, Johann Hofmann <jhofm...@mozilla.com> a écrit : > > There's a valid concern around warning fatigue (plastering so many sites > with "Insecure" that users easily dismiss it) and we made those prefs to be > able to run user studies on it. > > > Did Mozilla run UX studies about it? If yes, links would be appreciated. > > Secure/Insecure intuitively seems for me a wrong metaphor. Or more exactly > a metaphor which has been carried away too long and has now lost its > meaning. Some HTTPS sites are/will not be secure. And some HTTP sites will > be more innocuous than some HTTPS sites. > > > > -- > Karl Dubost, mozilla 💡 Webcompat > http://www.la-grange.net/karl/moz > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > firefox-dev mailing list > firefox-...@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform