I’ve forwarded this conversation thread to our UX researcher and designer,
Francis and Jacqueline. If we’ve run any studies, they’d be able to link us
to a report.

On 12 February 2018 at 11:58, Karl Dubost <kdub...@mozilla.com> wrote:

> Johann,
>
> Le 10 févr. 2018 à 00:51, Johann Hofmann <jhofm...@mozilla.com> a écrit :
> > There's a valid concern around warning fatigue (plastering so many sites
> with "Insecure" that users easily dismiss it) and we made those prefs to be
> able to run user studies on it.
>
>
> Did Mozilla run UX studies about it? If yes, links would be appreciated.
>
> Secure/Insecure intuitively seems for me a wrong metaphor. Or more exactly
> a metaphor which has been carried away too long and has now lost its
> meaning. Some HTTPS sites are/will not be secure. And some HTTP sites will
> be more innocuous than some HTTPS sites.
>
>
>
> --
> Karl Dubost, mozilla 💡 Webcompat
> http://www.la-grange.net/karl/moz
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> firefox-dev mailing list
> firefox-...@mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/firefox-dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to