By the way, do we know how many mdn contributions are made on these pages
by people who are not regular Firefox developers?
A push in-tree requires permissions, which isn't a small barrier, might
impact that (not mentioning the size of the repo).
If this is only a few people, this might not be an issue.

Sylvestre
Le jeu. 19 oct. 2017 à 17:38, Andreas Tolfsen <a...@sny.no> a écrit :

> Some time ago there was a discussion on dev-builds@ regarding
> the state of our in-tree source code documentation.  The main
> focus was that MDN, moving forward, will mainly revolve around web
> platform documentation and would actively start de-emphasising Gecko
> contribution docs.
>
> Now, that discussion paints the backdrop for this new thread, but it
> is well worth reading on its own and had a lot of good ideas in it
> that never materialised:
>
>
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.builds/cp4bJ1QJXTE/Xqy_nHV5DAAJ
>
> The reality four months on is that more documentation than ever
> lives in the tree, and there is a sentiment that imposing the
> same rigorous peer review process we have for source code on
> documentation changes is overkill.
>
> bz made a modest proposal that documentation changes should not
> require bugs or reviews, and that they could be annotated with a
> special review flag to pass pre-receive hooks.  I’m including his
> original email below.
>
> If we still feel this is a good idea I would like to know what steps
> to take next to make that policy.
>
> -- >8 --
> From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu>
> Date: June 16, 2017 15:40
> Subject: Re: Builds docs on MDN
> To: dev-bui...@lists.mozilla.org
>
> On 6/16/17 9:33 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> > I certainly feel like the barrier for filing bugs, creating a
> > patch, figuring out how to use readthedocs infrastructure, getting
> > reviews, etc. isn't really worth it
>
> I believe we should not require filing bugs, reviews, or any of
> that for in-tree docs.  Just edit the doc, commit, push.  Add
> "r=documentation" if needed to placate hooks.  Just because it's
> in-tree doesn't mean it needs to use the whole heavyweight process.
> And if we can make these things auto-DONTBUILD, that's even better,
> of course.
>
> I agree it's still slower than a wiki. :(
> _______________________________________________
> dev-platform mailing list
> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to