On 07/07/2017 06:03 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017, at 01:42 PM, Jet Villegas wrote: >> Thanks for cleaning this up. >> >> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Xidorn Quan <m...@upsuper.org> wrote: >> >>> Although they don't currently match anything on web content, there is >>> still some risk for unshipping them. Specifically, some websites seem to >>> use them for browser-sniffing. >> >> Do you have some example sites that do this? > > Yes, bug 1378846 is an example that a site doesn't render correctly in > Stylo due to lack of support of that.
Would it be doable to parse them, but never match them? We do the same for the :-moz-placeholder pseudo-class for similar reasons... This would be slightly more tricky than just not parse them, at least until we get rid of them internally (if we do), but would allow pages using that kind of hacks to keep working. -- Emilio _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
