On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Ben Kelly <bke...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:00 AM, David Burns <dbu...@mozilla.com> wrote: > > > On 22 March 2017 at 13:49, Ben Kelly <bke...@mozilla.com> wrote: > > > >> Finding someone to own the feature and investigate intermittents is > >> important too, but that doesn't mean the tests have zero value. > >> > > > > This just strikes me that we are going to disable until they are all gone > > then we have dead code in the tree and still no one to own it. Its a > longer > > process that could end up at the same end point. > > > > Are *all* the tests intermittent? My quick read of the bug was that its a > single test. I just don't understand the logic of *removing green tests* > from the tree. The idea they might one day become intermittent is not > compelling to me. > Leaving aside this part, I think Joel's request is help to find an owner for these tests who can be responsible for maintaining them. I think this is the right approach and will help get the test suite into a better state over time. Finding an owner makes the rest of this thread moot at this point (although we can certainly talk about policy separately). Is there an obvious owner for the new tab page tests and Bugzilla component? To which engineering team does this work now fall? Lawrence _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
