I've submitted a response in support of the charter, without
comments.

-David

On Monday 2016-10-24 10:47 +0800, Shih-Chiang Chien wrote:
> Support revised charter.
> 
> The revised charter creates some flexibility for us to promote Flyweb as a
> new feature in Presentation API Level 2, which has been discussed in the
> F2F meeting of the WG this year. It also create a good structure to move
> non-WebAPI discussion to CG and keep WG focusing on the API development.
> 
> [additional information on Mozilla's implementation plan]
> The current plan is to enable 1-UA implementation on Fennec on Nightly
> (release 52). No detailed engineering plan on Firefox desktop for now. We
> are cultivating some proposal to identify the usability of this API on
> desktop browser before dumping engineering resource on it.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Shih-Chiang Chien
> Mozilla Taiwan
> 
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Tantek Γ‡elik <tan...@cs.stanford.edu>
> wrote:
> 
> > I have reviewed the charter and the current set of deliverables. The
> > work appears to be proceeding reasonably (pragmatically, with many
> > members/implementers including Apple and Google) and reasonably
> > minimally scoped. There is also the companion Second Screen Community
> > Group which appears to be used to incubate work before proceeding in
> > the working group, a pattern which we are generally supportive of.
> >
> > Support revised charter.
> >
> > I don't know of our current implementation plans on this WG's deliverables.
> >
> > The most recent discussion here of any of the deliverables of the WG
> > was on "PresentationAPI", in particular a "[PresentationAPI] Intend to
> > implement" thread here in 2014 September.
> >
> > Tantek
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:28 PM, L. David Baron <dba...@dbaron.org>
> > wrote:
> > > The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
> > >
> > >   Second Screen Working Group
> > >   https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2016Sep/0011.html
> > >   https://www.w3.org/2014/secondscreen/charter-2016.html
> > >
> > > Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through
> > > next Tuesday, October 25.
> > >
> > > Please reply to this thread if you think there's something we should
> > > say as part of this charter review, or if you think we should
> > > support or oppose it.
> > >
> > > Mozilla does have participants in this group:
> > > https://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=74168&public=1&order=org#_
> > MozillaFoundation
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > > --
> > > π„ž   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
> > > 𝄒   Mozilla                          https://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
> > >              Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
> > >              What I was walling in or walling out,
> > >              And to whom I was like to give offense.
> > >                - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > dev-platform mailing list
> > > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev-platform mailing list
> > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
> >

-- 
π„ž   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄒   Mozilla                          https://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
             Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
             What I was walling in or walling out,
             And to whom I was like to give offense.
               - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to