On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Marcos Caceres <mar...@marcosc.com> wrote: > Well, it covers the 80% case (specially on mobile, where tabs are not > at useful). But yeah... the model is not there :(
That is a good point. When isolated to a browsing context it's still very useful information for website UX. > We should maybe also pref .query() too... wdyt? The main question I have is whether we ever want more than three states, to indicate something about the scope of the permission. But maybe we could have a new call for that. > I think it slipped through with: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.platform/7RnCrXoXdG4/Oy84atEoKgAJ > > We might need to be more careful in the future about granularity of > intent to ship to particular methods. Interesting, I guess I didn't realize that covered more than just query(). If we ship a subset of an API it probably would help to be clear, indeed. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/ _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
