I do use it - but LSPs obviously cause the networking team more trouble than other folks.
I have no objection if the UI just wants to move it to somewhere less obtrusive though - as long as its there. On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Aaron Klotz <akl...@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 7/25/2016 12:20 AM, Nicholas Nethercote wrote: > >> I suspect it is rare for this field to be useful. (I've never found it >> useful.) It is also long, typically dozens of lines, and typically accounts >> for a quarter or more of the space taken up by the fields in the "Details" >> tab. >> >> I use it when evaluating potential additions to the DLL blocklist. If the > proposed DLL is an LSP, we cannot block it. Typically the crash reports > whose correlations made the case for blocking the DLL will also show > whether or not that DLL is an LSP via that field. > > The additional GUID spew is also useful if we end up landing the LSP > blocklist that I prototyped in bug 1238735. > > I propose removing it from the "Details" tab. It will still be visible in >> the "Metadata" tab. Any objections? Am I missing any reason why it is >> frequently useful? >> >> No objections. As long as it is available *somewhere* on crash-stats, > that should be fine. > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
