On 25/07/16 16:48, Daniel Holbert wrote:
On 07/25/2016 07:11 AM, Ms2ger wrote:
Hey Jonathan,
[...]
Do we know how other vendors feel about this?
Sentiment seems to be positive.
Browser vendors are collaborating on developing the Houdini specs, and I
haven't heard any serious reservations on this spec. (This is among the
more simple/stable of the Houdini family of specs.)
I believe we're not the only ones working on an implementation, too --
Google has a work-in-progress implementation of the Houdini "CSS Paint"
API (with a brief demo video here [1]), and that API layers on top of
this feature ("css properties & values"), which I think means they're
also working on implementing this feature.
Are there automated tests that will be shared with other vendors (and
Servo)?
There are some reftests on the bug [2] (final patch).
AIUI if you move those tests to somewhere under
layout/reftests/w3c-css/submitted then dbaron will upstream them to the
CSSWG testsuite at some point.
Alternatively I have no qualms about putting them in web-platform-tests
where there are fewer metadata requirements and they will certainly be
shared, but CSSWG might grumble at you.
Either way we should put them somewhere where it is possible for other
vendors to check for interoperability.
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
