On 2016-04-28 8:53 AM, smaug wrote: > On 04/28/2016 08:00 AM, Gerald Squelart wrote: > >> Because sometimes the function will choose not to actually move from >> an rvalue-ref > > FWIW, this is the reason why I think Move is broken by definition. Move > doesn't move anything. > It should have been designed differently, so that a temporary object is > created to ensure move is always happening or something like that > (though, that might lead to leaks in some cases).
The analysis that I suggested can help with enforcing that a Move() cannot be used in cases where the code is not respecting move semantics, so it should help with your concern (which I do share.) _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
