Even better! On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Steve Fink <sf...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 04/08/2016 09:13 AM, Andreas Farre wrote: > >> Looking for someone emacs savvy to help me with running mach --debug as a >> command for M-x gdb. Currently there is an issue with mach logging a bit >> to >> much which screws up the GDB/MI communication with emacs. Has anyone >> already some solution for this? Otherwise I got it working by adding a >> quiet flag to mach --debug that changes the log level to not log >> informative messages, is this the "right" way? >> >> > Perhaps this should be handled similarly to the what I did in bug 991343, > where I suppressed timestamps in the build output to avoid breaking emacs's > next-error and previous-error. I haven't run mach --debug under emacs in > the way you describe, but it seems like another good use of $INSIDE_EMACS > if I am understanding correctly. > > I don't know if it works for what you're doing, but these days I either > run with something like mach run --debug --debugger=debug, where 'debug' is > https://people.mozilla.org/~sfink/data/debug > > Or equally likely, I run it under rr first to record it, then debug via > replay. > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
