On 2016-03-14 6:43 PM, Kyle Huey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com > <mailto:ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 2016-03-14 3:23 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > On 9/8/15 3:21 PM, Luke Wagner wrote: > >> On a more technical detail: WebKit and Chromium have both shipped, > >> returning the number of logical processors where WebKit additionally > >> clamps to 2 (on iOS) or 8 (otherwise) [6] which is explicitly allowed > >> by WHATWG text [7]. I would argue for not clamping (like Chrome), > > > > Given the use cases, should we clamp to our per-origin limit? > > I brought this up in an in person meeting about this a while ago. It > seems pretty hard to justify returning a number more than our per-origin > worker limit. To be clear, this will be a clamping different to what > WebKit does. > > > That number is 20 or 50 or something like that though.
Ah yeah, we bumped it up to 50 in bug 1241485, so I guess the clamping won't matter for most machines that people use these days. _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
