On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Martin Thomson <m...@mozilla.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Valentin Gosu <valentin.g...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> Thumbnails, or columns on the right for each selected browser with >>> median (or mean), with the best (for that site) in green, the worst in >>> red would allow eyeballing the results and finding interesting >>> differences without clicking on 100 links....... (please!) Or to avoid >>> overloading the page, one page with graphs like today, another with the >>> columns I indicated (where clicking on the row takes you to the graph >>> page for that side). >>> >> >> What I noticed is that pages with lots of elements, and elements that come >> from different sources seem to have a higher variability. So pages such as >> flickr, with lots of images with various sizes, or pages that load various >> ads. > > You currently graph every test result, sorted. This can be reduced to > a single measurement. Here I think that you can take the 5th, 50th > and 95th percentiles (mean isn't particularly interesting, and you > want to avoid extreme outliers). The x axis can then be used for > something else. The obvious choice is that you turn this into a bar > graph with browsers on that x-axis. You could probably remove the > browser selector then.
Oh, to be a little less obtuse, I think that means that you get a column graph with error bars on each column. Your x-axis is by browser (and version) with two columns for each (first view and refresh). _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
